Sunday, February 28, 2021
15.1 C
Johannesburg
Home Africa Land Expropriation — the moral dilemma

Land Expropriation — the moral dilemma

Jesuit priest, moral theologian and ethicist, Anthony Egan assesses the public debate taking place around Land Expropriation from a moral and ethical standpoint and in the light of principles enshrined within Catholic Social Thought. He warns against doing what is “politically fashionable” because it runs the risk of being “poison to the common good”.

President Cyril Ramaphosa is not naive. Pressured perhaps – by populists in his own and opposition parties. As he apparently embarks on land expropriation he cannot but be aware of the moral dilemmas inherent in land reform.

From the perspective of justice alone, the issue may seem obvious. Land claimed by conquest and laws implemented in the apartheid era and before should be restored to descendants of those displaced. This seems all the more urgent in South Africa, where the gap between rich and poor, historically, but today not exclusively based on race, is consistently the greatest in the world.

But simple moral answers, any ethicist will tell you, are often unhelpful. Moral absolutism with a ‘one size fits all’ application doesn’t work. All principles that seek the good need to be applied to the specifics of a problem. And all moral actions have consequences, intended and unintended.

On the latter, land reform in general and land expropriation (with or without compensation) has had an, at best, ambivalent outcome. The obvious neoliberal capitalist biases of the Wall Street Journal and similar newspapers aside, land expropriation in countries like Venezuela and Zimbabwe have been pretty disastrous, undermining countries’ food security and harming the very people it claimed to be helping: the poor. In many places, poorly trained (or untrained) new farmers wrought havoc, through no ill-will of their own, on the land creating food insecurity, leading to spiralling inflation and increased poverty.

Combine this with reduced investor confidence leading to declining investment and even disinvestment, and sometimes economic sanctions, and the recipe is chaos. A chaos that often leads to the rise or strengthening of populist demagoguery and the decline of democracy.

One could, I suppose, still invoke the doctrine of double effect in such cases, arguing that the morally neutral or good acts (land reform, restoration etc.) had good intentions (equality, justice, promotion of the dignity of the poor) but (at the risk of sounding flippant) ‘unfortunate’ side effects. (Some ethicists might add that since the effects could be foreseen as a real possibility, the doctrine here might not apply). A simple risk-benefit analysis of consequences might convince many that the decision is wrong, despite the high moral principles.

Careful application of the Catholic principle of the Common Good creates a more fruitful moral space, I suggest. Faced with at least two moral goods – greater equality rooted in justice and food and broader economic security, both need to be taken into account in making any decision, which must be rooted in prudence: carefully balanced reasoning that seeks the wisest choice.

In practice, this suggests thinking outside the current box to create alternatives: allocation of land only to those suitably trained to use it well (i.e. both productively and ecologically), intensive state training and technical support for potential new farmers, even profit-sharing between current owners and historical claimants.

Above all, as they pursue their course, President Ramaphosa and his colleagues need to clearly distinguish between what is good and what is politically fashionable. Populism in socio-economic policy-making is poison to the common good.


Images: Pexels

* The opinions expressed here by Spotlight.Africa contributors and editors are their own and not official statements of the Society of Jesus in South Africa or of the Catholic Church unless explicitly stated.

1 COMMENT

  1. With respect, the above is not very helpful. With minor variations, the centrist section of the national commentariat has been repeating it almost ad nauseum. The question is no longer about ethics vs “prudence” (I do not think the writer is not one of those closet apologists for colonialism or neo-paternalists who always want to determine the agency and pace of the African renaissance). The urgent question is what is the best political mechanism to tackle this issue in one swift, bold stroke – somewhat like the emperor Alexander did with the gordian knot. I think South Africa should set up an internationally funded, supervised/adjudicated, scrupulously independent, transparent and politically non partisan three to five year programme of comprehensive land reform. The idea should be tested by a national referendum to get the population’s necessary buy-in.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here

This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. Learn how your comment data is processed.

Anthony Egan SJ
Anthony Egan is a Jesuit priest who works at the Jesuit Institute South Africa. He teaches at Steve Biko Ethics Centre Faculty of Health Sciences at WITS University. He also teaches in the Ubuntu Programme for Fordham University at the University of Pretoria. He writes for various journals and publications and regularly offers analysis and comment on politics and the Catholic Church.

Most Popular

What do you truly desire?

Inspired by a Netflix series and an Ash Wednesday retreat, Sarah-Leah Pimentel reflects on what she wants out of life. She explains that a...

Continued support for Trump casts shadow on global democracy

United States President Joseph R. Biden Jr, has been in office just shy of a month.  Many people, inside and outside of US borders...

Two roads diverged in a wood: Vaccine nationalism or global cooperation?

The squabbles between the United Kingdom and Europe over access to the COVID-19 vaccine reveals a self-centered nationalism in efforts to end the pandemic,...

Vaccine hesitancy, efficacy and rollout

Controversy and misinformation have thwarted the effort of governments around the world in rolling out COVID-19 vaccination programmes. Shrikant Peters, a medical doctor, dispels...

Archives